Share this
We write for Research Live about balance when using AI
by Infotools on 21 Jun 2023
In our latest article for the Market Research Society’s Research Live blog and newsletter, our marketing lead, Michael Howard, writes about balancing the use of ChatGPT and generative AI with the human element of market research. By leveraging AI capabilities, researchers can (and will) definitely unlock new opportunities for engaging with data and gaining valuable insights. But, there is a cautionary tale here too: we can’t lose sight of the “heart of market research”, which Michael maintains will remain entirely human.
Technology plays a key role in freeing up the market researcher’s time to pursue more “human” centered activities, centered on empathy, curiosity and the like. AI is no different. Michael writes, “Our work is just aided by ChatGPT, just as other more mainstream technology or our team members aid us in doing our jobs every day.” The human touch remains crucial in interpreting and contextualizing data, ensuring that the insights are integrated with domain knowledge and researcher intuition.
Investing in technology of any kind, including AI, can be inherently risky. Security concerns, costs, learning curves and more can prove challenging. However, with AI, you can apply its algorithms to existing systems. AI tools “are not reliant on external expertise to train and implement across your business. The hope is to find the balance between getting the best out of both your people and your technology in a way that benefits your customers.”
He concludes the article with: “While the balance point between technology and human skills may be different for each company, AI can certainly amplify and enhance human strengths within market research. There is no doubt that job functions and necessary skills will shift, and the face of market research will change perceptibly. Yet, we can be sure of one thing: humans still matter in this equation.”
You can read the complete article here: https://www.research-live.com/article/opinion/chatgpt-and-the-human-element-of-research/id/5113593
Share this
- November 2024 (2)
- October 2024 (4)
- September 2024 (4)
- August 2024 (6)
- July 2024 (7)
- June 2024 (4)
- May 2024 (7)
- April 2024 (6)
- March 2024 (3)
- February 2024 (8)
- January 2024 (3)
- December 2023 (6)
- November 2023 (5)
- October 2023 (3)
- September 2023 (8)
- August 2023 (4)
- July 2023 (6)
- June 2023 (6)
- May 2023 (3)
- April 2023 (6)
- March 2023 (6)
- February 2023 (4)
- January 2023 (2)
- December 2022 (2)
- November 2022 (8)
- October 2022 (6)
- September 2022 (6)
- August 2022 (7)
- July 2022 (5)
- June 2022 (6)
- May 2022 (5)
- April 2022 (4)
- March 2022 (8)
- February 2022 (7)
- January 2022 (1)
- December 2021 (2)
- November 2021 (2)
- July 2021 (4)
- June 2021 (2)
- May 2021 (4)
- April 2021 (2)
- March 2021 (5)
- February 2021 (3)
- January 2021 (3)
- December 2020 (1)
- November 2020 (5)
- October 2020 (2)
- September 2020 (5)
- August 2020 (4)
- July 2020 (4)
- June 2020 (1)
- May 2020 (3)
- April 2020 (6)
- March 2020 (3)
- February 2020 (4)
- January 2020 (2)
- December 2019 (4)
- November 2019 (4)
- October 2019 (3)
- September 2019 (2)
- August 2019 (4)
- July 2019 (5)
- June 2019 (2)
- May 2019 (4)
- April 2019 (4)
- March 2019 (2)
- February 2019 (4)
- January 2019 (3)
- December 2018 (5)
- November 2018 (2)
- October 2018 (1)
- September 2018 (3)
- August 2018 (5)
- June 2018 (4)
- May 2018 (4)
- April 2018 (3)
- December 2017 (1)
- November 2017 (2)
- October 2017 (1)
- September 2017 (3)
- August 2017 (2)
- June 2017 (2)
- February 2017 (2)
- January 2017 (2)
- December 2016 (2)
- September 2016 (1)
No Comments Yet
Let us know what you think